First of all, using one interface, regardless of analysers and devices, is more convenient and easier to learn,” Dr. “There are several reasons for managing everything from GLIMS. “We only use middleware if it brings added value for the patient or offers functionality that GLIMS does not have,” says Dr. GLIMS had to be in the driver’s seat for all communication with the track’s operating system (routing engine) and the analysers. Clear agreements between MIPS and track supplier Sysmex defined how the track and GLIMS would communicate. There is no direct communication between the routing engine and the analysers. This has made requesting tests much easier, clearer and intuitive for doctors. Today, ice is no longer needed for most samples, so they can be transported via the regular tube transport, without manual processing.”Īdditional gains were made by reducing the 23 different order forms to just three: one for blood, one for urine and one for other materials. A good example is samples transported on ice: in the old lab, we receive more than 100 of these every day. “But even when that wasn’t possible, we sought ways to eliminate time-consuming actions. “Our lab carries out millions of tests every year, which means we are always striving for process simplification and improvement. One ambition was for all incoming samples to be placed directly on the track without manual intervention,” Dr. Using a unique approach, the tender was designed to ensure that the suppliers would work together and dialogue with the hospital jointly. Given the complexity of the design, no single supplier could offer everything. To resolve this, and open up the possibilities inherent in GLIMS, they decided to switch to a new, cross-laboratory GLIMS deployment.Īll of this was then translated into one streamlined functional design, which became the starting point for LUMC’s tender, in compliance with the EU public tendering rules. It was clear that this laboratory-specific approach was creating an obstacle to future developments. At the same time, other LUMC clinical laboratories, including Medical Microbiology, Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Specific Haematology and Immunohematology, were also using GLIMS, but with their own system configurations. Judith Gillis, laboratory specialist clinical chemistry focusing on total diagnostic test processes at LUMC, and one of the project leaders.Įach individual unit – Clinical Chemistry, Haematology and Blood Transfusion – had its own GLIMS laboratory information system (LIS). For us that meant transforming into a single, large, automated laboratory that would enable us to deliver more efficient diagnostics,” says Dr. While the Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC) laboratory used to be divided into separate units, today, activities have been centralised as the Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (KCL) department.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |